distinctions between multi-title offences and other similar cases
نویسندگان
چکیده
in most legal systems of the world, the rule of multi-title offences is an accepted one whereby the punishment is the most serious when an act can come under a number of offence titles. however, it is subtly related to some other legal concepts such as specificity, contradiction, inclusion, appropriation and forcive judges. in most of time, distinguish between them is confused which can have serious repercussion. the purpose of the present article is to clarify the differences between multi-title offences with similar legal cases in a detailed manner to show how each can be enacted in the proper context. the paper shows how, in many cases, punishments can be wrongly determined and how the legislators can be effective when misunderstandings happen.
منابع مشابه
MULTI-MODAL UTILE DISTINCTIONS Multi-Modal Utile Distinctions
We introduce Multi-Modal Utility Trees (MMU), an algorithm for autonomously learning decision treebased state abstractions in Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes with multi-modal observations. MMU builds the trees using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistical test. Additionally, MMU incorporates the ability to perform online tree restructuring, enabling it to build and maintain a compact ...
متن کاملSome Distinctions Between Self-Similar and Self-Affine Estimates of Fractal Dimension with Case History
Compass, power-spectral, and roughness-length estimates of fractal dimension are widely used to evaluate the fractal characteristics of geological and geophysical variables. These techniques reveal self-similar or self-affine fractal characteristics and are uniquely suited for certain analysis. Compass measurements establish the self-similarity of profile and can be used to classify profiles ba...
متن کاملDistinctions between emotion and mood
Most academics agree that emotions and moods are related but distinct phenomena. The present study assessed emotion-mood distinctions among a non-academic population and compared these views with distinctions proposed in the literature. Content analysis of responses from 106 participants identified 16 themes, with cause (65% of respondents), duration (40%), control (25%), experience (15%), and ...
متن کاملExploring perceptually similar cases with multi-dimensional scaling
Retrieving a set of known lesions similar to the one being evaluated might be of value for assisting radiologists to distinguish between benign and Results malignant clustered micro-calcifications (MCs) in mammograms. In this work, we investigate how perceptually similar cases with clustered MCs may relate to each other in terms of their underlying characteristics (from disease condition to ima...
متن کاملDistinctions between bipolar and unipolar depression.
This is a review of the studies comparing unipolar and bipolar depression, with focus on the course, symptomatology, neurobiology, and psychosocial literatures. These are reviewed with one question in mind: does the evidence support diagnosing bipolar and unipolar depressions as the same disorder or different? The current nomenclature of bipolar and unipolar disorders has resulted in research t...
متن کاملDistinctions between diagnostic and classification criteria?
Rohit Aggarwal, Sarah Ringold, Dinesh Khanna,Tuhina Neogi, Sindhu R. Johnson, Amy Miller, Hermine I. Brunner, Rikke Ogawa , David Felson, Alexis Ogdie, Daniel Aletaha, Brian M. Feldman Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh; Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children’s Hospital; Department of Medicine, University of Michigan; Division of Rheumatology, Toronto Western and Mount Sinai H...
متن کاملمنابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
مطالعات حقوق خصوصیجلد ۴۳، شماره ۳، صفحات ۶۹-۸۷
کلمات کلیدی
میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023